The Samsung Galaxy
S25 Ultra has been marketed as the ultimate flagship, but it has left many
users disappointed due to its lack of meaningful upgrades and some frustrating
compromises. While it still offers a premium experience, it fails to justify
its hefty price tag.
- Display:
6.9-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X with 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+,
and 2600 nits peak brightness.
- Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset for
blazing-fast performance.
- RAM & Storage: Options include 12GB RAM with 256GB/ 512GB/ 1TB
Storage, and 16GB RAM with 1TB Storage.
- Camera System:
- Main Camera: 200MP ISOCELL HP sensor.
- Ultrawide Camera: 50MP ISOCELL JN sensor.
- Telephoto Lens: 12MP Sony IMX754 sensor with 3x
optical zoom.
- Periscope Telephoto: 50MP sensor with 5x Optical Zoom.
- Battery: 5000mAh
with 45W Fast Charging and 15W Wireless Charging.
- Build & Design: Titanium Frame, Corning Gorilla Armor 2 glass and IP68 Water Resistance.
- Software: Android 15 with One UI 7,
supporting up to 7 major Android upgrades.
- S Pen Support: Comes with a built-in stylus.
Pros:
AI Features:
Samsung has deeply integrated Galaxy AI, allowing users to perform multiple
actions across apps using voice commands.
Display Quality:
The 6.9-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED screen is bright and vibrant, offering QHD+
resolution and 120Hz refresh rate.
Solid Performance:
The Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset ensures smooth multitasking and gaming.
Lighter Build: The
phone is slimmer and lighter than its predecessor, making it more comfortable
to hold.
Cons:
Minimal Design
Changes: The S25 Ultra looks almost identical to its predecessor, with only
minor tweaks. The flat edges make it harder to grip, and the silver camera
rings attract dust.
Underwhelming
Camera Performance: Despite the 200MP main sensor, image quality relies heavily
on software processing, especially in low-light conditions. The 3X and 5X
telephoto lenses have smaller sensors, leading to noisy images.
Limited RAM
Options: While competitors offer 16GB RAM, Samsung sticks to 8GB and 12GB,
which feels outdated for a premium device.
Battery Life &
Charging: The 5,000mAh battery struggles to last a full day under heavy use, and
charging takes 1.5 hours, whereas rivals offer 40-minute fast charging.
S Pen Downgrade:
The Bluetooth functionality has been removed, meaning users can no longer
remotely control the camera or presentations. Samsung also charges extra for a
black S Pen.
No Qi2 Wireless
Charging Magnets: While Qi2 charging is supported, users must buy a compatible
case since the phone lacks built-in magnets.
Verdict:
The Galaxy S25
Ultra is a capable flagship, but it lacks innovation. The downgraded S Pen,
unimpressive camera performance, and slow charging make it hard to justify its
premium price. If you’re looking for a true upgrade, competitors like Vivo and
Xiaomi offer better hardware at a lower cost.
Would you like
recommendations for alternative flagship smartphones?
